Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 5th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Leighton Buzzard Observer site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bypass ruled out for eight years


Council heckled by angry residents

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
22 January 2008
THERE were angry scenes at a village hall when residents heckled planners over continued delays in building the Wing Bypass.
And many of them were angry at alternative ideas to building a Wing bypass, such as traffic calming and improved public transport.

South Beds Friends of the Earth organised the meeting to give local people an opportunity to hear a presentation of
the report and ask questions of the author, Tom Cohen, of Steer Davis Gleave transport consultants.

But the alternatives were not well received and considered by many to be totally inadequate.

Among the audience were residents of settlements along the A418 and from villages that are affected by "rat running."

Residents from Rowsham, Wing Mill and Beirton, described their experiences with dangerous levels of traffic and concerns were expressed for the safety of children living on or near the A418.

FoE spokeswoman, Victoria Harvey said a "vocal minority" saw it as a chance to heckle Bucks County Council and FoE, which meant the opportunity to hear and question the experts was wasted and many people did not have a chance to have their questions answered.

The long-suffering villagers reacted with fury after they were stunned to hear that there would be no funding for the controversial road until at least 2016 - and maybe not even then.

MORE than 150 people packed into Wing Village Hall for a presentation on the controversial A418 improvement proposals.

The meeting was told that the full route of the A 418 improvements, costing £128 million, between the Wing Hill roundabout and the A41 South of Aylesbury will definitely not get funded before 2016, and there is only a small chance that they will be funded after 2016.

The £40,000 report, jointly funded by South Beds FoE and the county council, looked at how different packages of alternatives compared against the road scheme.

The objectives included alleviating the negative impact of the traffic passing through the settlements on the A418, stopping rat running, supporting the economy of Aylesbury, improving walking and cycling in and between the villages on the A418 and social inclusion.

Difficulties were cost, minimising CO2 emissions , preventing more traffic being generated, avoiding harm to other local communities and preserving landscape quality.

The report also looked at three packages of alternatives solutions – a modest package including a serious push to remove the school run, a mid-range scheme including huge improvements in buses, and an ambitious package which includes East West Rail.

Computer analysis showed that the road scheme came out lowest, said Miss Harvey.

Even if relieving the negative impact of traffic on the A418 communities was programmed in as far more important than everything else, the alternatives still come out better than the road scheme, she argued.

The county council will now do further work to evaluate the alternatives and look in detail at the effectiveness of them.

"The reality of the funding situation is that there definitely will not be any funding for a road for eight years minimum," said Miss Harvey.

"Many people said that they supported increased buses and a cycle bridge over the Linslade western bypass but there are not even any applications for funding these.



The full article contains 538 words and appears in Leighton Buzzard Observer newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 21 January 2008 12:18 PM
  • Source: Leighton Buzzard Observer
  • Location: Leighton Buzzard
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.