Linslade 'artisan' homes-and-work studios rejected due to Green Belt 'harm'

Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com 
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Visit Shots! now
A proposal for an 'artisan' community in Leighton-Linslade has been rejected due to it being "harmful to the Green Belt".

Central Bedfordshire Council has turned down applicant Kevin Smith of Knebworth’s scheme, which aimed to build 20 homes-come-work studios on land adjacent to Stoke Road. However, despite the site's promises to have "zero carbon footprint", a communal heating system, and allotments, it was rejected on environmental grounds.

The council's refusal notice states: "It is an inappropriate form of development in the Green Belt and therefore, by definition, harmful to the Green Belt. It would fail to preserve the openness of the Green Belt, would fail to check the unrestricted sprawl of a large built-up area, and would fail to safeguard the countryside from encroachment."

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The council notes that the proposal would "erode the buffer" between established residential development and Linslade Wood, having a "detrimental impact" on the countryside. It also criticises the "lack of ecological information provided" and says that the proposal would add to "recreational disturbance" in the area.

The proposed development. Image: Shaw and Jagger Architects.The proposed development. Image: Shaw and Jagger Architects.
The proposed development. Image: Shaw and Jagger Architects.

Other reasons for rejection include a lack of affordable housing units, and a lack of flood and surface water drainage information provided. The proposed development would also be "outside the Settlement Envelope of Leighton Linslade and in open countryside", making it contrary to a 'Windfall Development' policy in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan (2015-2035).

The refusal notice adds: "The proposal fails to make adequate provision for off street parking and, if permitted, would lead to an increase in on street parking, thereby resulting in additional hazards and inconvenience to users of the highway."

It concludes: "[It] would have an unacceptable impact on existing local infrastructure."

News you can trust since 1861
Follow us
©National World Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice